This week I have been wrapped up in the business of curating a group exhibition in the Nunnery Gallery which will have its opening reception tonight, Thursday 25th of February.
I took up the position of curator for this show due to my background in set design; believing there to be several important similarities between the role of a curator and that of a set designer. Fundamentally, both professions are concerned with the narration of space. They both pivot on spectatorship and they must both work within certain perfunctory parameters such as sight lines and fields of light. So although this was my first attempt at curation, I entered into the gallery space on Monday morning believing that I had something to offer to the process... Little did I know just how much I’d learn from the experience.
There is a very different way in which a curator combines the work of separate artists to the way in which a theatre maker combined the contributions of individual theatre practitioners. There is a notion of the integrity of each piece of work in the former that is not present in the later. For a curator, there are demands that the artist’s work is set apart, so that it can stand on its own as an individual piece. Admittedly, today the role of the curator is expanding and becoming more fluid and free; a fact that appears to be a source of great concern to certain members of the art world (see Claire Bishop’s Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics ). There still exists today a very palpable opposition to the curator who extends his/her remit beyond the mere function of hanging. Curators who attempt to juxtapose different art works, with the aim to finding new meaning in so doing, inevitable meet with opposition.
This notion of the integrity of an individual piece, which is so deeply ingrained in the minds of fine artists, is not an issue in the art of theatre making. The work of a theatre maker is never intended to stand in isolation. From its very conception each element is intended for synthesis. Theatre always creates new meanings through methods of combining, juxtaposing and aligning the work of separate artists. No single element speaks alone, nor is it meant to.
I could say much, much more about what I have learned in the past week, but the whole thing has me utterly beat. So for now... I must sleep
I took up the position of curator for this show due to my background in set design; believing there to be several important similarities between the role of a curator and that of a set designer. Fundamentally, both professions are concerned with the narration of space. They both pivot on spectatorship and they must both work within certain perfunctory parameters such as sight lines and fields of light. So although this was my first attempt at curation, I entered into the gallery space on Monday morning believing that I had something to offer to the process... Little did I know just how much I’d learn from the experience.
There is a very different way in which a curator combines the work of separate artists to the way in which a theatre maker combined the contributions of individual theatre practitioners. There is a notion of the integrity of each piece of work in the former that is not present in the later. For a curator, there are demands that the artist’s work is set apart, so that it can stand on its own as an individual piece. Admittedly, today the role of the curator is expanding and becoming more fluid and free; a fact that appears to be a source of great concern to certain members of the art world (see Claire Bishop’s Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics ). There still exists today a very palpable opposition to the curator who extends his/her remit beyond the mere function of hanging. Curators who attempt to juxtapose different art works, with the aim to finding new meaning in so doing, inevitable meet with opposition.
This notion of the integrity of an individual piece, which is so deeply ingrained in the minds of fine artists, is not an issue in the art of theatre making. The work of a theatre maker is never intended to stand in isolation. From its very conception each element is intended for synthesis. Theatre always creates new meanings through methods of combining, juxtaposing and aligning the work of separate artists. No single element speaks alone, nor is it meant to.
I could say much, much more about what I have learned in the past week, but the whole thing has me utterly beat. So for now... I must sleep